The Deleuzian Notion of the Image: Slicing the World, Or Cinema Beyond the Human (via Networkologies)

Crystal-image-eye: Deleuze‘s Worldslicing

What precisely does Deleuze mean by cinema, and with it, the image? And why should a philosopher, or filmmaker, care? It seems to me that his radical notion of the image, straddling both philosophy and film, is so incredibly powerful, if often misunderstood. Many find his cinema books impenetrable, but once one understands this key notion, they open up. What does it mean, for Deleuze, to do cinema, to image an aspect of the world?

The Strange Case of the Cinema Books: Some Context as an Introduction

I’m currently teaching Deleuze’s Cinema I & II, once again, to my students. And I think part of the reason I keep teaching these books, aside from the fact that at an art school they are so incredibly relevant, is that they are so incredibly, polymorphously fertile texts.… Read More

via Networkologies

Published by: Cengiz Erdem

Received his master's and doctoral degrees from The University of East Anglia in England, Norwich. He specializes in culture and communication, creative writing and critical theory, cinema, philosophy, and psychoanalysis. He has written many articles and is the author of five books... |~| *** |~| Kültür ve iletişim, eleştirel teori, edebiyat ve yaratıcı yazarlık alanlarında uzmanlaşmış, yüksek lisans ve doktorasını İngiltere’de tamamlamıştır. Felsefe, iletişim, sinema, psikanaliz ve edebiyat alanlarında yazdığı pek çok makalenin yanı sıra yayımlanmış beş kitabı vardır...

Categories Cinema, Deleuze, Infinite IndefinitesTags, , , , , , , Leave a comment

Leave a comment